coding

The user wants me to analyze the company "coding" and build a detailed workforce analysis report. This is an unusual company name - it might be a coding bootcamp, a coding education platform, or something related to software development.

Let me start by gathering information about this company. I need to:

1. Search for information about the company "coding"
2. Determine its size, structure, and operations
3. Map its workforce to O*NET codes
4. Estimate headcount distribution
5. Apply automation/augmentation shares
6. Build the organizational hierarchy
7. Call org_report_finalizer with the complete report*

Let me start with broad searches to understand what "coding" is as a company. I should search for multiple angles in parallel to gather context quickly.

I'll begin with searches about:

• The company "coding" itself
• Coding company workforce/employees
• Coding company headquarters/locations
• Maybe variations like "Coding Inc" or "Coding company"

Let me start broad and parallel.

Now I need to analyze what I've found. The user asked about "coding" which is an ambiguous name. From my search results, I found several possibilities:

1. Coder (coder.com) - An AI software development company with ~543 employees (according to LeadIQ Sept 2025), $15M revenue, headquartered in Austin, TX. This is described as a cloud development environment platform. However, there's conflicting data - one source says 50 employees (PitchBook), another says 543 (LeadIQ), another says 501-1000 (one snippet).

2. The Coding Company - Multiple entities with this name:

   • A software solutions company (2-10 employees) based in Wichita, Kansas
   • A healthcare management services provider (medical coding) with global reach
   • Other small software development shops

3. Programming.com - A global software solution company with either 680 employees or 2000+ employees according to different sources

4. The Coding Network - A medical coding services company (healthcare)

5. Various coding education platforms (Code.org, Codecademy, etc.) but these seem less likely given the user just said "coding"

The most likely candidate is Coder (coder.com) since:

• It's a substantial technology company
• Has recent funding ($35M in June 2024)
• Clear business model (AI software development/cloud development environments)
• Multiple data points confirming its existence

However, there's significant confusion about employee count. Let me do more targeted searches to clarify which "coding" company this is and get better data.

Actually, I should consider that the user might literally mean "coding" as a generic company name. But that's unlikely to have specific organizational data.

Let me search more specifically for "Coder" which seems most likely, and try to get clearer employee data.

Okay, based on all my research, I need to make a decision about which "coding" company the user is referring to. The most substantive data I have is for:

Coder (coder.com) - AI software development/Cloud Development Environment company

• Headquarters: Austin, Texas (confirmed by multiple sources)
• Founded: 2017
• Industry: Software Development / Developer tools
• Funding: $82.8M-$85.2M total, latest $35M Series C in June 2024
• Revenue: $15M (as of Sept 2025)
• Employee count is INCONSISTENT across sources:
  • LinkedIn: 11-50 employees
  • PitchBook: 50 employees
  • LeadIQ (Sept 2025): 543 employees
  • Tracxn (Dec 2022): 19 employees
  • Owler: 25-100 employees
  • Built In article (2020): ~25 employees, planned to double
  • 2024 blog post: mentions "headcount doubled in 2023"

The most likely reconciliation is:

• In 2020: ~25 employees
• In 2022: 19 employees (possible contraction/restructuring)
• In 2023: headcount doubled (from ~20 to ~40)
• Current (2025): LinkedIn says 11-50, which aligns with ~40-50 range

The 543 number from LeadIQ seems like an error or they're confusing with a different company.

I'll proceed with Coder as the target company with approximately 50 employees as the most reliable current estimate, placing them in the "TINY" category (1-50 employees) per the hierarchy rules.

Given this is a TINY company (<50 employees), the hierarchy should be:

• L0: Executive Team (CEO, CTO, Co-founders)
• L1: 2-4 functional areas (Engineering, Product, Sales/Marketing, Operations)
• L2: Individual roles with O*NET codes
• Total nodes: 3-10 minimum*

Now I need to build out the organizational structure based on what I know about software development companies of this size.